The Infinite Love and Mercy of
God as Expressed in Psalm 103
(Copyright©2020, 2022, 2025 by
Daniel B. Sedory)
To explore all that Psalm 103 has to say about the blessings of God in more detail, I'd heartily recommend listening to this
sermon by John MacArthur: Remembering All His Benefits • Psalm
103.
In verses 11-12, the Holy Spirit writing through David provides us with two illustrations of God's committed love and complete
forgiveness of all our sins which, as MacArthur (or "John" in what follows) says, "are the most perfect illustrations you could
find in human language."
The second of these two illustrations is:
“As far as the east is from the west, So far has He removed our transgressions from us. (Psalm 103:12;
NAU)” — emphasis mine.
The phrase, “As far as the east is from the west,” occurs only here in Scripture, and as far as I've been able to
determine it's not found anywhere else independent of Psalm 103. And as we'll see shortly, it must have been the Spirit of God who gave David an
illustration of infinity in this phrase. My explanation here begins by asking: Could the psalmist have added 'and as far as the north is from the
south' to this verse? Well, no. God knows that a person heading north or south from any point on earth (by means of a ship if necessary and with the
proper life-sustaining gear) will eventually reach the 'North' or 'South' Pole; at which point, continuing any further, means
they would then be heading in the opposite direction! The North and South Poles are literally as far as one can travel in those directions; so
in that regard, north and south can never be more than the distance between those two points; about 12,430 miles (or 20,004 km). Is there such a thing
as the East or West Pole? Of course not.[1]
I have no idea if David believed the earth was a sphere, but he did know that whenever someone traveled further east or west, the
point (that is, the physical location of "the horizon") at which they saw the sun rise or set got further and further away from wherever they
began their journey, and he may have inferred the earth was round either from that or from watching a ship slowly disappear from the bottom up beyond
the horizon of the Mediterranean Sea. Today we know there is no location on earth one can point to and say, ‘This is where east (or
west) ends.’ Why? Because east and west are directions! So this Biblical
illustration is indeed one which tells us about the infinite Mercy and Grace of God, because no matter how many times you circle the earth
heading east or west, you could never get to a point where you would be moving in a direction that’s opposite to the other;
even if you were able to circle the globe an infinite number of times![2] Therefore, east
and west are as far apart as anything could ever be! At least 340 years ago (having died in 1680), Stephen Charnock said, "The east
and west are the greatest distance in the world; the terms can never meet together. When sin is pardoned, it is never charged
again; the guilt of it can no more return, than east can become west, or west become east."[3] And that will always be true.
My main reason for writing the above was because the only thing that John MacArthur had to say about this was: "Line going in
two opposite directions, go into infinity." (And watching the video of his sermon, you'll see he held up both thumbs and moved them in opposite
directions while speaking.) Having only that to go on, it could easily appear that John was talking about a straight line heading off into space in
opposite directions. But I believe he simply expected all of us to see that line as infinitely wrapping around the earth, since the terms east
and west, even today, have no meaning in space; only on the surface of earth (or some other rotating objects we may apply them to, such
as the moon).
Why it is Impossible to Interpret Psalm 103 as Lines Extending into Space
In the diagrams below I've drawn some little circles here which represent the earth, with "NP" standing for the North Pole, some
curved brown arrows which show the direction of earth’s rotation (which from the North Pole is counterclockwise) and lines extending into space for what
someone standing on the earth at a particular moment in time (at #1), would call east and west and also (in Diagram
1) where those so-called directional lines would be pointing exactly 12 hours later (at #2) for the very same location:
Then, in Diagram 2, you can clearly see that at some time after 12 hours have passed (but before exactly 24 hours, those directional lines
will actually intersect. So any lines pointing out into space, would very often have East meeting West for the same person in the same location. But,
this would also be true for those who believe the earth is stationary (does not rotate),[4] by simply moving to a different
location. And as shown in Diagram 3, as soon as you have your east/west lines remain straight (not curved) and they leave the surface of
the earth (becoming two separate lines), they will intersect quite close together. Even when those lines are parallel to each other, you have east and west
pointing in the same direction away from earth! But, no where in Scriptre did God have have David (or any other writer) add some caveat
like, "But only for a particular moment in time; not for two different times" nor for only one specific location. No, God’s
revelation through David was for everyone at all times, so this type of explanation (attempting to extend lines of east and west into space) would be
contrary to the Scriptures!
Comments on the First Illustration of Infinity in Psalm 103
“For as high as the heavens are above the earth,
So great is His lovingkindness toward those who fear Him (Psalm 103:11; NAU)” — emphasis mine.
Let's take a look at how the word "heavens" (שָׁמַיִם;
shāmayim) is used in Scripture: In the simple prefatory statement on all Creation, we have in Genesis 1:1, "the heavens and the
earth" which refers to everything God created in the physical universe. But in many passages, such as Psalm 104:12a (“Beside them the
birds of the heavens dwell;”), it's clear that "heavens" may refer to only that part above the earth which we call the sky (or the
atmosphere). In other contexts, the word is used of what we would call space. For example, in Genesis 1:14-17, "the expanse of the
heavens" seems to refer to wherever God placed his newly created “lights” — the sun, moon and all the stars; that is,
everything in the physical universe apart from the earth and its atmosphere. But "heavens" (shāmayim) is also used when
describing where God dwells (Deuteronomy 26:15; 1 Kings 8:30); though these and other such descriptions are often a condescension from reality for
the human mind that still today can barely begin to comprehend the vastness of the physical universe which God created. As creatures we are bound
by the three dimensions of the space we all live in, and cannot truly imagine anything apart from it; if we try, the words we must use will betray
the fact we cannot do so. Perhaps stating, ‘God dwells outside of his Creation’ is the best we can do. Yet God is immediately
present everywhere and cannot be confined by anything: “"Do I not fill the heavens and the earth?" declares the LORD. (Jeremiah
23:24; NAU)”
In Isaiah 55:8-9, we have a passage describing another attribute of God: “"For My thoughts are not your thoughts, Nor
are your ways My ways," declares the LORD. "For as the heavens are higher than the earth, So are My ways higher than
your ways And My thoughts than your thoughts.” — emphasis mine. This usage of "heavens"
could be understood metaphorically as meaning something that will always be beyond whatever humans will ever think or accomplish, but I'd like to
think of it as a reference to the heaven where God existed ‘outside of, and before, creating the physical Universe’.
And because Psalm 103 itself contains such a reference (“The LORD has established His throne in the heavens, And His sovereignty rules over
all. (Ps 103:19; NAU),” I believe we should also see verse 11 as the infinity which separates both our minds and our physical
universe from God's mind and the heaven where only He could dwell before Creation.
Either way, whether you see the phrase “as high as the heavens are above the earth” as referring only to the atmosphere above the
earth (as some Bible translations, such as the NET Bible, make clear by using the English word “sky”)[5]
but taking this as a metaphor for an incomprehensible distance, or as a reference to the heaven outside of our physical
universe, all Believers understand this phrase as a description of God’s infinite love. On the other hand, there are some who look at the vastness
of space (which we already mentioned in conjunction with Genesis 1:14-17), and see in that as to what the word “heavensּ refers to here. Some
have proposed that our physical universe is infinite in size, but there is no way to prove that! In the end, that belief still remians in the realm of
metaphor for something infinite.
I wrote the words above, because John MacArthur actually said very little about how infinite God’s love truly is. He
started to do so by providing us with a physical distance, saying: "The latest NASA stat tells us that they think they know where the
edge of the universe is, and they suggest this: If you go 186,000 miles a second, which is the speed of light, you could reach the end of the known
universe in 225 trillion years." In fact, that's much farther than NASA has ever claimed it to be, and here's the reason: That value has nothing to do
with the speed of light, but rather mankind's rocket technology in 2014.[6] The value you'll find in in multiple
sources over the past decade for the distance to the edge of the known universe is 46.6 billion light-years.[7]
Yet that was all John said about God's love being infinite. But there is no number, distance or time you could ever dream of
that comes close to equaling infinity or eternity! However, John’s concluding statement about this illustration is well worth
repeating:
"He loves us with a committed and covenant love that is infinite; has no bounds. ... It's so stunning and so staggering, that you
might wonder if it's actually true. But God wants to illustrate His love for us in an infinite way."
Charnock said, "Since his majesty is infinite, his mercy must be as great as his majesty."[8]
I'll finish with a similar thought: God loves his Believers and has mercy upon them to the same extent that his thoughts and
ways are higher than ours! (Compare the words here in Psalm 103:11 with these: “For as the heavens are higher than the earth” in Isaiah
55:9.)
[If this essay has blessed you in any way, it's purely the work of the Holy Spirit and none of my own - Dan, TheStarman.]
Footnotes
1[Return
to Text] Unlike north and south, there are no points on earth that can truly be defined as "the east" or "the
west" (those terms are always relative, depending upon geographical, historical or even cultural contexts; such as "the
Far East," "Eastern Religions," or "the Old West" and Western movies—within the United States.
Western Civilization, or during WWII, "the Eastern Front;" from the perspective of Germany and many other examples could also
be provided showing the relativity of such terms). It is true, however, that north and south can also be used in a localized sense, such as a
reference to "the North" or "the South" during the Civil War of the United States. But terms, such as, "the Northern" or
"the Southern" hemispheres, based upon the North and South Poles (and the existence of the earth's axis), are absolute.
2[Return
to Text] Note: Someone might object and bring up the fact that sailors (or anyone with a global positioning 'App' today) can tell you
where they are in terms of so many degrees, minutes and seconds 'East' or 'West' and once you have gone a certain distance (no more than half-way
around the globe), you'll find yourself using an 'E' or 'W' designation that's opposite to the one you started with. But this is purely arbitrary.
When mankind first decided how such locations should be designated, they arbitrarily chose the 'prime meridian' (or zero degrees) to be a line
running through Greenwich, England, with measurements 'East' or 'West' of Greenwich ceasing at 180 degrees. However, as I've already pointed out,
those are locations not directions. If you continue heading east (or west) through 180 degrees; no
matter what 'E' or 'W' longitudes appear on a map or GPS device, you will still be heading in that direction; not its
opposite, no matter how many times you circle the earth.
3[Return
to Text] Stephen Charnock, Discourses Upon the Existence and Attributes of God (1979 Reprint by Baker Book House Company of
the Robert Carter & Brothers, 1853 edition. ISBN: 0-8010-2437-4; Cover picture), Volume 2, Discourse XIII, On
God's Dominion, p. 358. Note: Emphasis in this quote is mine. Here's a picture of the quote.
There are many editions of Charnock's works, and archive.org has many copies as well. Here's the best example I could find (as both searchable online
and offline in a free PDF download): Volume 2 (1853
Edition)! This has the same page numbers as in my hardcopy edition. You can download: Volume 1 (1853 Edition) as well.
4[Return
to Text] Even those who think the earth is 'flat' and deny its 'curvature' would have to agree with the logic, that east and west are not lines
extending into the heavens, but then they run right into a huge contradiction: For most of them, their model of a 'flat earth'
has all the east/west lines of lattitude curving around the earth in circles! They’ve actually traded one type of curvature for another! Yet
every experiment anyone has devised, proves that the lines of east/west are exactly 90 degrees (right angle) to those of north/south! Although you might
observe some phenomena like mirages due to refraction. Or, the scattering or dispersion of light due to particles in the air, or even rainbows
(due to both water droplets and refraction) or found the answer to “Why is the sky blue?” None of these can explain why a laser beam that has
been calibrated and tested to point exactly true north or south, when pointing east or west, does not curve! They consistently give us perfectly straight
lines (at right angles to any north/south line) all over the earth; which no temporary atmospheric conditions can account for as existing everywhere at the
same time! So, some 'flat earth' believers then turn to a 'rectangular model' where both the north/south and the east/west lines of direction are at right
angles to each other. Of course, they then hit the brick wall of never being able to explain how one can travel to 'the one and only' North Pole
from any direction south of it! There is so much data about the earth’s far northern regions and how close they are to each other, that not even a
firm believer in a 'flat earth' would generally accept that earth is rectangular, with neither a south nor a north pole. So, they’re stuck with having
to somehow prove the curvature of all east/west lines of direction!
5[Return
to Text] Hebrew (שָׁמַיִם; shāmayim), Aramaic (similar to
the Hebrew), Greek (οὐρανός; ouranos) and even Latin (caelum) all have only
those single terms for both the physical heavens (the sky/atmosphere, or space; where the sun, moon, stars and everything else exist) and
the supernatuaral Heaven outside of our universe! And the only way to determine for sure what the words mean (or leave ambiguous) is by whatever CONTEXT
exists surrounding their usage. You might be interested in reading this 2006 article from The Bible Translator (2006.57:92-95) by Norm Mundhenk on
Heaven and Earth. I intend to do a much
deeper dive into what the Hebrew word means in Genesis 1:1 in the near future.
6[Return
to Text] This value did not come from any official statement by NASA, but rather a
misinterpretation of a newspaper article written by the "Weather/Science/Climate/Space Reporter" Doyle
Rice, for USA Today. In fact, Mr. Rice never claimed that his value for how long it would take to reach the edge of the universe
using "our current level of technology" came from NASA; only that NASA was one of his sources (which included:
"Universe Today [a space and astronomy site], NASA, Phil Plait [an astronomer and writer] and Slate [an online
magazine]") for the six different locations he wrote about in his article, so it could have come from any of the other three,
or had even been a value he computed himself. [Note: Rice's article appears to have had all of its content removed
from USA Today's archives (and although I found a cached copy from Google, I can no longer see any content there as well. However, just recently (07-02-2020), I was able to
find a copy of it here: eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/05/02/space-day-distances/8618041/. But if that copy gets pulled as well, or you wish
to read some of my notes about the article: Here's a copy I made purely for academic
research.)]
NASA has officially
stated that it took "the light [from the edge of the observable universe] nearly 14 billion years to reach us" on this web
page: How Big Is Our Universe - NASA. However,
that evolutionary estimate for the age of the universe which is ever expanding, allows them to compute its current distance from us as 46.6
billion light-years. (See note 4 below.)
There were only two other sources I found; apart from John's sermon (and those now copying what
he said), where the phrase "225 trillion light-years" occurs. If you look at the following, it seems likely that someone took
Leith Cunningham's misinterpretation of Doyle Rice's article (all of which Cunningham did copy correctly to his
own web page) as being a known fact, so perhaps that's how it ended up in John MacArthur's sermon: Article by Leith Lyman Cunningham
1/1/2017.
(I've added an annotated copy of the relevant paragraphs from Mr. Cunningham's article
here.) Unfortunately, others are now copying these words from pastor MacArthur’s sermon and repeating them as fact without ever verifying
what they say or write about it.
7[Return
to Text] For example, Wikipedia's article: Observable
universe or this one from the BBC: Now We Know the Size of the Universe and numerous others.
8[Return to Text] Stephen Charnock, ibid., page 359. Here's a link to pages 358-359 at archive.org.
I revised this essay the same day I published it, after finally noticing that Doyle Rice never stated the edge of the universe was 225
trillion light years away, but rather that it would ideally take "225 trillion years"
for say an un-manned probe to reach it [though further study showed that would be impossible (according to current cosmological theory), and likely why
it was removed from USA Today's website].
Slightly revised again on 18 MAY 2020; with addition of Stephen Charnock quotes. More minor revisions on 16 OCT 2022.
2 JAN 2024; added little circular diagram and note about how it is impossible to separate any supposed east and west direction in space!
7 FEB 2025; made a number of clarifications to the text, added footnotes regarding flat earth beliefs and another one on translating the only
Hebrew word for both sky (atmosphere), the rest of our physical universe and the heaven in which only angels or those with glorified bodies
can dwell.